The collaborative experience
Interesting to compare the collaborative wiki on the OLL course and the RM course. Like all comparisons, there are some variables which reduce the poignancy of any potential conclusions …but, the OLL has a very clear task, deadline and we have together (sort of) forged our individual responsibilities. The RM wiki was a useful forum for editing a list of interview / survey questions, but there was so much politeness that it took ages to get anywhere. There were too many verbose comments (including mine) to wade through. We failed as a group to identify individual responsibilities and – for me – motivation waned.
On the downside of wikis generally, they still feel cumbersome to edit and use. Perhaps this simply improves with practice. There not beautiful creatures, though…
1 Comment »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (4)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Really useful comment – and maybe the wiki wasn’t the best tool for the task? It’s veeeeeery interesting the way you note the positive aspect of individual responsibilities while working collaboratively! I’d love to know more about how that was successful.